The Geography of Packaging: Why Location Strategy Matters More Than Ever

For decades, packaging operated behind the scenes — essential, reliable but rarely in the spotlight. Today, it has become a $1-trillion global industry at the crossroads of automation technology, sustainability mandates and geopolitical uncertainty. For companies planning new facilities or expansions, location strategy isn’t just about cost – it’s about resilience, speed and alignment with future-ready operations.

Raw Material Access

Packaging is highly material-dependent, from plastic resins and foam to metal, wood or recycled fiber. For high-tech sectors, the material dependency becomes even more critical, as manufacturers rely on highly specialized materials such as electrostatic discharge (ESD)-safe polymers, engineered foams, cleanroom-grade films and precision-cut composites that require strict quality control and consistent supply. Locating near suppliers shortens lead times, stabilizes quality and supports recycled-content goals, all of which directly protect profit margins.  

Tariffs on imported packaging materials, such as resin, paperboard and aluminum, are reshaping cost structures and supply chains. To mitigate risk, packaging companies are diversifying suppliers, substituting materials and regionalizing production closer to end-markets.

Customer and Market Proximity

Packaging manufacturers are looking to minimize freight costs and meet tight delivery windows. Locating near customers such as food, beverage, personal-care and pharmaceutical companies enables shorter shipping windows, lower freight costs and faster design-to-market cycles. Flexible packaging firms tend to co-locate near food and beverage producers, while corrugated manufacturers rely on interstate adjacencies to be able to serve multiple regional customers within a day’s drive. Small shifts in freight or fuel costs can erase the advantage of lower labor rates, so modeling total logistics cost is essential.

Logistics Infrastructure

Reliable and well-developed infrastructure is non-negotiable for a packaging plant. Manufacturers prioritize access to interstate corridors, intermodal terminals and distribution hubs. Proximity to major highways reduces transit times and freight costs. Access to rail and intermodal terminals lowers transportation costs for bulk raw materials, like resin, paper rolls and aluminum, while supporting export flows for global customers. Packaging companies benefit from being near distribution hubs because it shortens delivery times, reduces transportation costs and allows faster response to customer needs or supply chain changes. 

Many packaging companies have accumulated a patchwork of facilities through mergers and acquisitions—creating a portfolio of plants of varying ages, capabilities and logistical advantages. Rationalizing these portfolios through network optimization, rightsizing or relocation can reduce duplicate fixed costs, improve freight efficiency and better align capacity with demand.

Labor and Skills Availability

Automation is redefining packaging operations, but it has not reduced the need for people; rather, it has changed the kind of workforce required. Modern facilities depend on technicians who can calibrate robotics, maintain mechatronic systems and integrate data platforms across production lines. The impact is even greater in the fast-growing high-tech packaging segment, where advanced electronics, semiconductors and medical-device products require precision automation, traceability and tightly controlled environments. When evaluating a region, it is important to look beyond broad labor availability to the strength of technical-training partnerships between local employers and colleges. 

The most competitive regions invest in workforce ecosystems, partnering with technical colleges and training centers to produce automation-ready talent. 

For corporate decision-makers, labor discussions are shifting from “how much does it cost?” to “how quickly can we staff, train and sustain?”

Energy Reliability and Sustainability

Packaging operations are energy-intensive, and grid instability or high rates can erase other cost advantages. 

Packaging lines are also capital-intensive and increasingly automated, and any interruption in power can impact production and delivery schedules. Before committing to a location, companies should evaluate the industrial rate stability, redundancy and grid investment plans of local utilities. 

Sustainability is now expected. Locations with renewable energy, recycling facilities and circular supply chains hold a real advantage. Communities that invest in recycling or material recovery help companies meet Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) goals and strengthen operations.

Regulatory, ESG and Community-Fit

Packaging plants, especially paper, plastics and glass operations, face heightened scrutiny regarding environmental, social and governmental standards  and must demonstrate responsible resource use, emissions management and waste handling. Locations with clear permitting, strong environmental support and efficient approval processes help reduce project risk and delays. 

Customers also have ESG expectations in addition to regulators. Major brands want packaging suppliers that meet carbon, recycling and sourcing goals. Access to renewable energy, re-use/recycling networks and water stewardship programs are not “nice-to-have,” they are basic requirements for long-term competitiveness. 

For companies, “community-fit” is about matching brand values like sustainability, transparency and responsible growth. That alignment often determines which projects move from concept to ribbon-cutting.

Closing

Packaging is just as critical to the future of manufacturing as electric vehicles or semiconductors. The cost of inadequate packaging is estimated to be 10–30 times higher than the cost of the packaging itself due to damage, returns and lost sales. For high-tech goods, packaging failures can result in total product loss. The best locations offer access to reliable materials and infrastructure with proximity to customers and a skilled workforce capable of running highly automated operations. The best regions for growth are not simply the lowest cost, they are the most operationally ready, resilient and strategically aligned with business goals.

---

^{Originally published on Area Development, The Geography of Packaging: Why Location Strategy Matters More Than Ever}